Learn, hack!

URL

http://events.ccc.de/congress/2010/Fahrplan/attachments/1694_DanezisGuersesSurveillancePets2010.pdf

File name

1694_DanezisGuersesSurveillancePets2010.pdf

File size

177.5 KB

MD5

9b86f8e44de88cc75abc4e8b47e746e3

SHA1

6efa8b01b54249be75c98756a8811db8d8b9ad1b

The objective of the session is to provide a critical overview of "privacy research" within computer science. The mechanisms proposed in the last ten year include mechanisms for anonymous communications, censorship resistance, selective disclosure credentials (and their integration in identity management systems), as well as privacy in databases. All of these system are meant to shield the user from different aspects of on-line surveillance either through allowing a user to keep some of her data "confidential" or by allowing her to assert "control" over her data. We will illustrate using concrete examples, why some paradigms came to dominate the field, their advantages, but also their blind spots, and unfulfilled promises given the conditions of our surveillance societies. Since 2000 there has been a renewed interest amongst computer scientists in the field of ”privacy technology”. This includes mechanisms for “anonymous” communications, censorship resistance, selective disclosure credentials, as well as privacy in databases - all of which are meant to shield the user from some aspects of on-line surveillance. Beyond the lab, some of those systems have been deployed and are widely used today. Yet, the type of surveillance against which privacy technologies are supposed to offer protection is often ill-defined, and widely varying between works: from an individual who wishes “to hide an occasional purchase from his spouse”, to “groups coordinating political dissent under totalitarian regimes”. While privacy is seen as the key unifying theme of these works only one aspect of it is systematically represented, namely ”confidentiality”. Privacy as self-definition, informational self-determination or as a public good that needs to be negotiated is often neglected. Further, the increasing omni-presence of surveillance technologies, the informatisation of every day life, as well as active resistance to on-line surveillance are used as justifying departure points for privacy technologies but they have so far not been explored in depth in the privacy research field. In this talk, we explore the development of contemporary privacy technologies, its key results and methodologies. At its heart our argument is that the field of privacy technology was seeded by computer security and cryptography experts that rushed to apply their tools to new problems, yielding mixed results. Additional pressures from different stakeholders to devise technology that will make large IT systems acceptable to the public has led to further confusion about the goals and methods most appropriate to embed privacy friendly values into computer systems. Further, the recent trend has been to replace the confidentiality paradigm with what can be called the "control" paradigm. Using concrete examples, we seek to explain why some paradigms came to dominate the field, their advantages, but also their blind spots, and unfulfilled promises.